Friday, May 6, 2011

Gatsby and the Need for New Research Paradigms

"About that.  As a matter of fact you needn't bother to ascertain.  I ascertained.  They're real...It's a bonafide piece of printed matter."
The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald

For some teachers, the surprise of authenticity has become the norm.  Such teachers bemoan the shortcomings of the modern student; they don't read enough, they don't know how to write properly, they can't focus, they don't care.  The rare gem of student work is greeted with the incredulity of Owl Eyes from Fitzgerald's novel.  The work is paraded in the faculty room as a beacon of hope, like Gatsby's green light - a symbol of what might have been but never will be.  Should we be so suprised?  Has the academic landscape become the New York of the 20s?  Are we languishing in an educational valley of ashes?  These are the questions I find myself asking in the face of colleague skepticism.  In the minds of some, poor or plagiarized work seems to be a fait accompli for the modern student.

Of course, nothing in Fitzgerald's novel escapes the trap of inauthenticity.  We as teachers need to re-examine our own practices, and consider how those practices encourage the kinds of disillusionment we sometimes seem to feel.  In fact, many outdated pedagogical practices prohibit modern students from being anything other than the scattered and indifferent consumers and parrots we then seek to persecute.  Certainly, software advances such as Noodle tools or Safe Assign and their like allow teachers to be vigilant against plagiarism, and aid our students in becoming responsible researchers.  Without a recontextualization, however, such tools are like the lemons and orchestras of Gatsby's parties: all flash, no substance.

Our assignments must change.  Our mindsets must change.  What counts as a valid research output in the future will likely bear as little resemblance to 8 1/2 x 11 white papers as Noodle tools do to the stacks of index cards from our youth.  The "formal research paper" may as easily be a formal research video or podcast; or even more likely, something we cannot yet readily conceive.  For those who would preserve the sanctity of the traditional research paper; are we preserving skills that will lack a forum in the world our students inhabit?  Should we hold to outdated models or forge ahead, discovering and creating new paradigms for a new world?

The shift is already happening; it is ALWAYS happening.  There is no living in the past.  If we want students who surprise us with their authenticy, we need to let them be authentically who they are; residents of the digital age.  This is happening in exciting ways such as this senior english thesis from a student at Bryn Mawr College.  As colleges and universities shift to meet the realities of the world, we cannot afford to wait for the changes to "trickle down".  For too many students, such an approach would be too little too late.

"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."  The Great Gatsby ends on this note of frustration as Nick reflects on the neverending toil of fighting against the past.  In changing our mindset of what counts as authentic and quality research output, perhaps we can cease to be the current holding them back.
Green light = Go
Photo by Curtis Newton
http://www.flickr.com/photos/curtisnewton/4089464649/

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Don't Be the Minotaur


powered by Fotopedia

Teaching the myth of Theseus to 9th graders is a wonderful opportunity.  Their lives are social mazes to which they often lack a solution.  Our role as teachers is to provide the ball of wool that will enable safe navigation. 

Too often, however, we become the minotaur, intent on devouring the boys and girls that are sent our way.  These children become sacrificial lambs to the monster of our own egos or stubbornness.  Particularly in the realm of technology, we tend to hold onto our tried and true solutions, hesitating to recognize that those solutions only work for far simpler mazes.  The flow and availability of information coupled with the collaborative nature of learning make for intricate designs and near impossible exits for the students of the present and future.  As Mitchel Resnick wrote; "However, schools are only one part of a broader learning ecosystem.In the digital age, learning must become a daylong and lifelongexperience. National education initiatives should aim to improve learning opportunities not only in schools, but also in homes, community centers, museums, and workplaces."
Too academic?  it is also the challenge Cobb firstlays out for Ariadne (!) as her 'interview' in the film Inception  demonstrating that the mazes of the present are complex - unable to be solved by simple formula or rote definition.

As the Great American Teach In approaches, and students, educators, administrators and communities prepare to reflect on ideal learning environments, how many participants will identify their current paradigms as labyrinthine?  Our challenge as educators/parents/students is to construct webs and pathways, networks and connections that will allow free entrance and exit through the mazes we face on our learning journeys.

Monday, May 2, 2011

Song of the Open Road

" Allons! the road is before us!
  It is safe—I have tried it—my own feet have tried it well—be not
      detain'd!
  Let the paper remain on the desk unwritten, and the book on the
      shelf unopen'd!
  Let the tools remain in the workshop! let the money remain unearn'd!
  Let the school stand! mind not the cry of the teacher!
  Let the preacher preach in his pulpit! let the lawyer plead in the
      court, and the judge expound the law.

  Camerado, I give you my hand!
  I give you my love more precious than money,
  I give you myself before preaching or law;
  Will you give me yourself? will you come travel with me?
  Shall we stick by each other as long as we live?"
-"Song of the Open Road", Walt Whitman

Though Whitman clearly did not know of Personal Learning Networks, my experience dipping my toes into this world of opportunity reminds me of his words.  In an age of digital footprints and multimedia interconnectivity, it seems we are constantly being invited to a journey of newness and discovery.  Simultaneously, the old paradigms (papers, books, tools, teachers) are being reinvented or left behind. 

Perhaps Harold Bloom's words, "If you are American, then Walt Whitman is your imaginative father and mother", ring as true for the digital age as they might have for previous generations.  As before, we find ourselves on a road with no fixed destination, no fixed route, a road marked by plurality and equivocity rather than singularity or univocity. 

The lesson I hear is quite clear: tweet, blog, collaborate, create, share, but whatever you do - get out on that road.

The ecclesiastic and the man

"The man and the ecclesiastic fought within him, and the victory fell to the man."
-Tess of the D'Urbervilles, Thomas Hardy

Teaching Tess in the current world climate increasingly brings me back to this quote.  We are still, as a world, torn between the rigidity of ecclesiastical thinking that Hardy despised and the human.  In the face of desparate need for empathetic connection, fundamentalism of all types (not simply religious) continues to violate and block that need. 

Hardy stopped writing novels because of their critical rejection.  How can we preserve a victory for the human within us in the face of the ecclesiastic?